奇怪了，我怎么不知道有冲突？
36771
%7B%22isLastPage%22%3Atrue%2C%22notes%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22pid%22%3A%22t36771%22%2C%22tid%22%3A%2236771%22%2C%22mainForumsId%22%3A%5B%22204%22%5D%2C%22categoriesId%22%3A%5Bnull%5D%2C%22tcId%22%3A%5B%5D%7D
%7B%22isEditMode%22%3Afalse%7D
回 1楼(婺源寻芳) 的帖子
好吧，我将冲突二字解释为 二者间有一个能对现实情况进行解释，而另一个却会导致计算等方面的错误。或二者对同一事件的预估是不一样的（包括概率）·······
意思明白就好我语文也不好，理解一下
意思明白就好我语文也不好，理解一下
引用
加载评论中，请稍候...
200字以内，仅用于支线交流，主线讨论请采用回复功能。
根据维基百科，两者并无矛盾
Even with the defining postulates of both Einstein's theory of general relativity and quantum theory being indisputably supported by rigorous and repeated empirical evidence and while they do not directly contradict each other theoretically (at least with regard to primary claims), they are resistant to being incorporated within one cohesive model.[37]
Even with the defining postulates of both Einstein's theory of general relativity and quantum theory being indisputably supported by rigorous and repeated empirical evidence and while they do not directly contradict each other theoretically (at least with regard to primary claims), they are resistant to being incorporated within one cohesive model.[37]
引用
加载评论中，请稍候...
200字以内，仅用于支线交流，主线讨论请采用回复功能。
现在有相对论范畴下的量子力学。所谓矛盾，只是由于相对论和量子力学的基本假设相去甚远，导致对于相同的问题描述很难统一。举个例子相对论依然有质点的概念，但是在量子力学下，我们描述就用波函数来描述了，那么在量子力学范畴下如何理解质点这个就成为问题了，不同的理解可能会导致不同的矛盾，而所谓相对论范畴下的量子力学就是致力于两者的契合又不失矛盾。
引用
加载评论中，请稍候...
200字以内，仅用于支线交流，主线讨论请采用回复功能。